About Me

Name: Sam T. Mullins
Location: Milton, FL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

United States has the richest deposits of oil shale

 

Excert Quote:

  http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/npr/publications/npr_strategic_significancev1.pdf

Strategic Significance of America’s Oil Shale Resource

Volume I     Assessment of Strategic Issues

March 2004 Final Report

Prepared for:  

Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary

for Petroleum Reserves

Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves

U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

 

 

Because of its magnitude and richness, oil shale in past years elicited more than a billion dollars in investment. Investment attractiveness is a necessary requisite of future development.  

The unconventional resources of the U.S. oil shale and Canadian tar sands are larger than total world resources of conventional petroleum. 
 
Oil produced from tar sands and oil shale will become increasingly attractive to supplement conventional crude supplies. 

With a resource base of more than 1 trillion barrels, the United States has the richest deposits of oil shale in the world. 

When developed, shale oil resources will be similar to Alberta tar sand. Between the two Countries, the United States and Canada will be able to claim the largest oil reserves in the world, and these reserves will support secure liquid fuels production for decades to come.
 
end exert quote...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

(Reuters) Arctic Circle holds an estimated 90 billion barrels

Quote:  http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080723/ts_nm/arctic_oil_dc

Arctic's oil could meet world demand for 3 years

By Tom Doggett Wed Jul 23, 5:41 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Arctic Circle holds an estimated 90 billion barrels of recoverable oil, enough supply to meet current world demand for almost three years, the U.S. Geological Survey forecast on Wednesday.

The forecast comes as Russia is competing with Canada, Denmark, Norway and the United States to grab a chunk of the huge energy resources in the Arctic, an area growing more accessible due to global warming melting the ice.

The government agency also said the area could contain 1,670 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas.

"Before we can make decisions about our future use of oil and gas and related decisions about protecting endangered species, native communities and the health of our planet, we need to know what's out there," said USGS Director Mark Myers.

"With this assessment, we're providing the same information to everyone in the world so that the global community can make those difficult decisions," he said.

Frank O'Donnell, president of the nonprofit group Clean Air Watch, said not only do polar bears and other wildlife within the Arctic Circle face losing their habitat due to global warming, they would be hurt by companies searching for oil.

"On the one hand you may see this region more accessible (for getting energy supplies), but we're definitely going to pay a different kind of price...you may loose species," O'Donnell said. "The oil industry goes up there and industrializes what has been a pristine area...suddenly it becomes the new Houston."

The 90 billion barrels of oil expected to be in the Arctic could meet current world oil demand of 86.4 million barrels a day for almost three years.

But the Arctic's oil is not intended to replace all the supplies in the rest of world. It would last much longer by boosting available supplies and possibly reducing U.S. reliance on imported crude in the future, if America developed the resources.

The Arctic accounts for about 13 percent of the world's undiscovered oil, 30 percent of the undiscovered natural gas and 20 percent of the undiscovered natural gas liquids, the agency said in the first publicly available petroleum resource estimate of the entire area north of the Arctic Circle.

More than half of the undiscovered oil resources are estimated to occur in just three geologic provinces: Arctic Alaska (30 billion barrels), the Amerasia Basin (9.7 billion barrels) and the East Greenland Rift Basins (8.9 billion barrels).

More than 70 percent of the undiscovered natural gas is likely to be in three provinces: the West Siberian Basin (651 Tcf), the East Barents Basins (318 Tcf) and Arctic Alaska (221 Tcf), the USGS said.

Technically recoverable resources are those energy supplies that can be put into the market using currently available technology and industry practices.

The USGS said it did not consider economic factors, such as the effects of permanent sea ice or water depths, in its assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources.

Energy companies have already found more than 400 oil and gas fields north of the Arctic Circle.

The discovered fields account for approximately 40 billion barrels of oil, more than 1,100 Tcf of gas and 8.5 billion barrels of natural gas liquids.

"Nevertheless, the Arctic, especially offshore, is essentially unexplored with respect to petroleum," the USGS said.

(Editing by David Gregorio)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Drill Here. Drill Now. Drill ANWR.

quote: http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/GrassrootPerspective/DrillANWR070208.shtml

Drill Here. Drill Now. Drill ANWR.

By Paul Driessen
July 2, 2008

 

 

Paul Driessen
Paul Driessen

“We can’t drill our way out of our energy problem.” This daily mantra, mostly from Democrats, underscores an abysmal grasp of economics by the politicians, activists, bureaucrats and judges who are dictating US policies. If only their hot air could be converted into usable energy.

Drilling is no silver bullet. But it is vital. It won’t generate overnight production. But just announcing that America is finally hunting oil again would send a powerful signal to energy markets… and to speculators – many of whom are betting that continued US drilling restrictions will further exacerbate the global demand-supply imbalance, and send “futures” prices even higher.

Pro-drilling policies would likely bring lower prices, as did recent announcements that Brazil had found new offshore oil fields and Iraq would sign contracts to increase oil production. Conversely, news that supplies are tightening – because of sabotage in Nigeria’s delta region, or more congressional bans on leasing – will send prices upward.

One of our best prospects is Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which geologists say contains billions of barrels of recoverable oil. If President Clinton hadn’t bowed to Wilderness Society demands and vetoed 1995 legislation, we’d be producing a million barrels a day from ANWR right now. That’s equal to US imports from Saudi Arabia, at $50 billion annually.

Drilling in ANWR would get new oil flowing in 5-10 years, depending on how many lawsuits environmentalists file. That’s far faster than benefits would flow from supposed alternatives: devoting millions more acres of cropland to corn or cellulosic ethanol, converting our vehicle fleet to hybrid and flex-fuel cars, building dozens of new nuclear power plants, and blanketing thousands of square miles with wind turbines and solar panels. These alternatives would take decades to implement, and all face political, legal, technological, economic and environmental hurdles.

ANWR is the size of South Carolina. Its narrow coastal plain is frozen and windswept most of the year. Wildlife flourish amid drilling and production in other Arctic regions, and would do so near ANWR facilities. Inuits who live there know this, and support drilling by an 8:1 margin. Gwich’in Indians who oppose drilling live hundreds of miles away – and have leased and drilled their own tribal lands, including caribou migratory routes.

Drilling and production operations would impact only 2,000 acres – to produce 15 billion gallons of oil annually. Saying this tiny footprint would spoil the refuge is like saying a major airport along South Carolina’s northern border would destroy the state’s scenery and wildlife.

It’s a far better bargain than producing 7 billion gallons of ethanol in 2007 from corn grown on and area the size of Indiana (23 million acres). It’s far better than using wind to generate enough electricity to power New York City, which would require blanketing Connecticut (3 million acres) with turbines.

Anti-drilling factions also assert: “US energy prices are high, because Americans consume 25% of the world’s oil, while possessing only 3% of its proven oil reserves.”

Possession has nothing to do with prices – any more than owning a library, but never opening the books, improves intellectual abilities; or owning farmland that’s never tilled feeds hungry people.

It is production that matters – and the United States has locked up vast energy resources. Not just an estimated 169 billion barrels of oil in the Outer Continental Shelf, Rockies, Great Lakes, Southwest and ANWR – but also natural gas, coal, uranium and hydroelectric resources.

“Proven reserves” are resources that drilling has confirmed exist and can be produced with current technology and prices. By imposing bans on leasing, and encouraging environmentalists to challenge seismic and drilling permits on existing leases, politicians ensure that we will never increase our proven reserves. In fact, reserves will decrease, as we deplete existing deposits and don’t replace them. The rhetoric is clever – but disingenuous, fraudulent and harmful.

The Geological Survey and Congressional Research Service say it’s 95% likely that there are 15.6 billion barrels of oil beneath ANWR. With today’s prices and technology, 60% of that is recoverable. At $135 a barrel, that represents $1.3 trillion that we would not have to send to Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. It means lower prices and reduced risks of oil spills from tankers carrying foreign crude.

It represents another $400 billion in state and federal royalties and corporate income taxes – plus billions in lease sale revenues, plus thousands of direct and indirect jobs, in addition to numerous jobs created when this $1.7 trillion total is invested in the USA.

It means additional billions in income tax revenues that those jobs would generate, and new opportunities for minority, poor and blue collar families to improve their lives and living standards. It means lower prices for gasoline, heating, cooling, food and other products.

That’s just ANWR. Factor in America’s other locked-up energy, and we’re talking tens of trillions of dollars that we either keep in the United States, by producing that energy… or ship overseas.

This energy belongs to all Americans. It’s not the private property of environmental pressure groups, or of politicians who cater to them in exchange for reelection support.

This energy is likewise the common heritage of mankind. Politicians and eco-activists have no right to keep it off limits – and tell the rest of the world: We have no intention of developing American energy. We don’t care if you need oil, soaring food and energy prices are pummeling your poor, or drilling in your countries harms your habitats to produce oil for US consumers.

Those attitudes are immoral and intolerable. It’s time to drill again here in America – while conserving more and pursuing new energy technologies for the future.

Paul Driessen is a GRIH Senior Fellow, senior policy advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality and for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, and the author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power - Black Death.
 
end quote...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More offshore oil drilling

Quote: Humberto Fontova
BrookesNews.Com

More offshore oil drilling

Humberto Fontova
BrookesNews.Com

Monday 19 May 2008

In the early 1960's the law of supply and demand greatly irked Cuba's “Minister of the Economy” Ernesto “Che” Guevara. “No problemo!” he divined one fine morning. I'll simply abolish it by creating a “New Man,” with these insufferable Cubans as my Guinea Pigs. The world's intelligentsia applauded deliriously as 14,000 Cubans were murdered by firing squad, 77,000 drowned or were ripped apart by sharks attempting to flee Guevara's whim, and half a million were herded into political prisons and forced labor camps at bayonet point. All of this out of a Cuban population of 6.5 million meaning that Castro and Che's political incarceration rate topped Stalin's.

And wouldn't you know it? After years of this glorious effort, cheered by everyone from Jean Paul Sartre to George McGovern and from Norman Mailer to Michael Moore, that doggone law of supply and demand held firm, while Cuba's per capita income (surpassing half of Europe's in the 1950's) plummeted to nudge Haiti's.

For fear of oil spills, as of 2008, the U.S. Federal government and various states ban drilling in thousands upon thousands of square miles off the U.S. Coast. These areas, primarily on the Outer Continental Shelf, hold an estimated 115 billion barrels of oil and 633 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.  This leaves America's energy needs increasingly at the mercy of foreign autocrats, despots and maniacs. All the while worldwide demand for oil ratchets ever and ever upward.

At times you'd swear that Che Guevara's bloody lesson (not to mention Lenin, Mao, and Pol Pot's) has yet to sink in. Barack Obama, for instance, proposes to solve the problem by slapping a “windfall profits” tax on oil companies. Such "hope" that more federal looting of oil producers will lower prices is not "audacious," it is totally unrealistic.

And that's only part of the idiocy. For those who favor evidence over dogma, a lesson in the “environmental perils” of offshore oil drilling presents itself every bit as starkly, though much less murderously. To wit: Of the roughly 3,700 offshore oil productions platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, roughly 3,200 lie off the Louisiana coast.  Yet Louisiana produces one-third of America's commercial fisheries and no major oil spill has ever soiled its coast.

On the other hand, Florida, which zealously prohibits from offshore oil drilling, had its gorgeous “Emerald Coast” panhandle beaches soiled by an ugly oil spill in 1976. This spill, as almost all oil spills, resulted from the transportation of oil — not from the extraction of oil.  Assuming dictators such as Hugo Chavez keep selling us oil, we'll need more oil and we'll need to keep transporting it stateside — typically to refineries in Louisiana and Texas.

This path takes those tankers (as the one in 1976) smack in front of Florida's panhandle beaches. Recall the Valdez, the Cadiz, the Argo Merchant. These were all tanker spills. The production of oil is relatively clean and safe. Again, it's the transportation that presents the greatest risk. And even these spills (though hyped hysterically as environmental catastrophes) always play out as minor blips, those pictures of oil soaked seagulls notwithstanding. To the horror and anguish of professional greenies, Alaska's Prince William Sound recovered completely. More birds get fried by landing on power lines and smashed to pulp against picture windows in one week than perished from three decades of oil spills.

But forget cheaper oil and less pollution for a second. All fishermen and scuba divers out there should plead with their states to open up offshore oil drilling post-haste. I refer to the fabulous fishing — the EXPLOSION of marine life that accompanies the construction of offshore oil platforms. "Environmentalists" wake up in the middle of the night sweating and whimpering about offshore oil platforms only because they've never seen what's under them. This proliferation of marine life around the platforms turned on its head every "environmental expert" opinion of its day.

The original plan, mandated by federal environmental "experts" back in the late '40s, was to remove the big, ugly, polluting, environmentally hazardous contraptions as soon as they stopped producing. Fine, said the oil companies. About 15 years ago, some wells played out off Louisiana and the oil companies tried to comply. Their ears are still ringing from the clamor fishermen put up. Turns out those platforms are going nowhere, and by popular demand of those with a bigger stake in the marine environment than any "environmentalist."

Every "environmental" superstition against these structures was turned on its head. Marine life had EXPLODED around these huge artificial reefs: A study by LSU's Sea Grant college shows that 85 percent of Louisiana fishing trips involve fishing around these platforms. The same study shows that there's 50 times more marine life around an oil production platform than in the surrounding mud bottoms.

An environmental study (by apparently honest scientists) revealed that urban runoff and treated sewage dump 12 times the amount of petroleum into the Gulf than those thousands of oil production platforms. And oil seeping naturally through the ocean floor into the Gulf, where it dissipates over time, accounts for 7 times the amount spilled by rigs and pipelines in any given year. The Flower Garden coral reefs lie off the Louisiana-Texas border. Unlike any of the Florida Keys reefs, they're surrounded by dozens of offshore oil platforms.

These have been pumping away for the past 50 years. Yet according to G.P. Schmahl, a Federal biologist who worked for decades in both places, "The Flower Gardens are much healthier, more pristine than anything in the Florida Keys. It was a surprise to me," he admits. "And I think it's a surprise to most people."

"A key measure of the health of a reef is the amount of area taken up by coral," according to a report by Steve Gittings, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's science coordinator for marine sanctuaries. "Louisiana's Flower Garden boasts nearly 50 percent coral cover. In the Florida Keys it can run as little as 5 percent."

Mark Ferrulo, a Florida "environmental activist," uses the very example of Louisiana for his anti-offshore drilling campaign, calling Louisiana's coast "the nation's toilet." Florida's fishing fleet must love fishing in toilets, and her restaurants serving what's in them. Most of the red snapper you eat in Florida restaurants are caught around Louisiana's oil platforms. We see the Florida-registered boats tied up to them constantly. Sometimes the locals can barely squeeze in.

America desperately needs more domestic oil. In the process of producing it, we'd also get a cheaper tab for broiled red snapper with crabmeat topping.


Humberto Fontova is the author of Exposing the Real Che Guevara and the Useful Idiots Who Idolize Him. Visit www.hfontova.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

EXPANDED DRILLING MEANS GOOD AMERICAN JOBS

 

Posted by Sam T. Mullins on Saturday, July 05, 2008 9:54:37 PM

 

I wanted to weigh in on the topic of expanded domestic Oil & gas exploration as a Petroleum Exploration Geologist with 25 years of industry experience...


EXPANDED DOMESTIC OIL & GAS EXPLORATION MEANS AMERICAN JOBS...

The upside to increasing domestic oil & gas drilling now that NO ONE has even been talking about is... JOBS...

Total oil & gas exploration jobs in the industry rose 256 percent by 491,000 jobs from 1973 to 1981. Many of these gains were erased, however, after the oil bubble burst in 1981. Within six years, 374,000 jobs had disappeared.

Most people don't even realize the hit our domestic oil & gas exploration industry took during the mid 1980s...

However, now with our nation finally waking up to the need to become energy independent, there is an additional upside to expanded domestic oil & gas exploration that no one seems to be focusing on..
That is good, high paying  AMERICAN JOBS ! ! !

There is the good paying drilling, industrial manufacturing jobs in steel & tubing/casing & pipeline production, rig construction & well equipment as well as heavy oil field tools & equipment & support industries as well.... 

Liberals continue to complain about the flow of American jobs out of our country overseas.

BUT, with expanded drilling in ANWR & off our coast, along with the support industry to do so, we have the opportunity to replace those 374,000 HIGH PAYING AMERICAN JOBS.

Again, we continued to be BLOCKED by liberals, who will not allow the drilling, nor the replacement of those 374,000 oil and gas exploration & support industry jobs that were lost in the 1980s. also BLOCKING AMERICAN economic growth & energy security & energy independence...

It is strange to me how the liberals want to blame Republicans and conservatives for the LACK of oil and a comprehensive domestic oil & gas exploration policy as part of an over all comprehensive energy plan. 

If the liberals would have set aside their party poltics for the greater good & needs for national energy security in 2000 or 2004, or even in 2006 when 3 times President Bush tried to get drilling restriction lifted, we would have NOW much more domestic oil & gas available now, and prices would never had gotten this high, and we would be much closer to energy security & independence...

Only 2500-4500 surface acre impact of a total of 19 million acres in ANWR will be needed to drill for our oil & gas there.

That is less than 0.02% of all of ANWR.

Also at this time 2/3 of all publicly and government owned lands & 3/4 of all offshore leases are off limits to exploration & drilling because of the liberals continued efforts to block domestic drilling...

Liberals in Congress continue to block drilling as well as  AMERICAN JOBS and our own national energy independence by NOT letting us drill here offshore, in ANWR,  and on currently restricted publicly owned lands.

Liberasl will NOT let us drill here & they do not want us to drill here NOW blocking American jobs & energy security for America...

We here in America need to be drilling NOW...

IF we have a crash expanded domestic drilling, program & policy which includes new refinery capacity and energy infrasturcture and support industries, coupled with bio-fuels from non-food stock plants & crops like wood-chip ethanol, & Jatropha,( a plant that is highly drought resistant, and can yield up to 10 times more biofuel than feed-corn, soy or sugar cane,), we could be well on our way as a nation within 5-6 years to becoming energy independent, becoming an energy exporter within 10 years...

And we can do this while also creating hundreds of thousands of high paying AMERICAN JOBS ! ! !

Thanks & hoping you & yours had a great INDEPENDENCE DAY !

GOD BLESS AMERICA !


Sam T. Mullins,
25 year long Oil & Gas Exploration Geologist,
Patriot, & proud father of a current 2 time U.S. Air Force veteran of the Iraqi theater of the Global War on Terror
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

quote:bloggingstocks.com "Florida coast shows promise for oil drilling"

 

Florida coast shows promise for oil drilling

One of the most controversial proposals for dropping the price of oil is to allow drilling in protected parklands and in restricted off-shore areas. Since there are deposits of crude and gas in these areas, it is also one of the more sure-fire ways of adding to production.

It now appears that the waters off Florida are among the most promising. According to the AP, "The early activity here stems from a 2006 Congressional compromise that allows drilling on 8.3 million acres more than 125 miles off the Panhandle."

The promise of the Florida coast is both good news and bad, depending which side of the debate one is on. A find of any real significance is likely to be proof of the fact that opening protected lands will yield results.

For the "green" crown, it could mean the the government will be encouraged to drill of near protected beaches. There may even be wells in Yellowstone.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OneNewsNow.com: China to drill off U.S. coast ...

quote: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=136992

China to drill off U.S. coast
 
Pete Chagnon - OneNewsNow - 6/16/2008 7:30:00 AMBookmark and Share

oil wellPresident Bush has been urged in a letter to do away with the moratorium on offshore drilling in the U.S.

 

 

The Institute for Energy Research sent the letter to President Bush urging him to exercise his authority to repeal the Executive Order banning energy production on America's outer continental shelf. The ban has been in effect since 1990. Congress also passes a similar ban on offshore drilling on a yearly basis.
 
Brian Kennedy is senior vice president for public affairs with the Institute for Energy Research. He argues the rationale behind his group's request that he believes would force Congress to take a longer view.
 
"We've gone ahead and asked the president to lead by ripping up the executive moratorium," Kennedy explains. "That would create a situation whereby the Congress would have to come up with a long-term strategy – not some annual ban that expires every year, but a long-term plan that would put some common sense and some flexibility into our offshore energy laws."
 
He wonders why the ban is still in place, seeing that China has plans to drill for energy 60 miles off the U.S. coastline. "The Cuban government has entered into contracts with China and a few other countries to begin to look at producing energy at the offshore, just 60 or so miles from the United States," says the Institute spokesman. "The U.S. is the only developed country in the world that restricts access to its offshore energy resources in the way that we do. It is what one senator called 'economic and strategic masochism.'"
 
Kennedy also contends there is no justifiable or defensible reason for the government to be restricting access to these supplies, especially considering the current energy situation. According to a Reuters article, House Republicans have recently vowed to push for more energy development within the United States. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) says Republicans will fight every single day over the next five months to hold the Democrats accountable for their "dismal record on producing more energy" in the U.S.
 
end quote...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oil Boom, Again? quote : tmslandowners.org

Oil Boom, Again?
 
Special to The Watchman June 19, 2008
"Tuscaloosa Marine Shale - Large Oil Resource Play"
quote :    tmslandowners.org  
That’s exactly what Fort Worth, Texas–based Encore Acquisition Company called it last month in a seven-page press release on the prospective oil zone known as the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale.   Encore describes its program as a "large oil resource play" covering 5,900 square miles, of which Encore has already leased some 208,000 net acres.
BRI Map
 
Encore’s press release goes on to state that it has drilled two wells to date.  First is the Joe Jackson Appraisal Well in Amite County, with initial production on a lateral length of 1,650’ that was fractured in three stages and placed on pump with an initial production of 175 barrels of oil per day. The second well, the Richland Plantation Appraisal Well located in East Feliciana Parish, is currently awaiting testing.
 
Encore has also announced two more appraisal wells to prove up additional acreage, with the third well having just recently spudded (commenced drilling) in St. Helena Parish.
Dan S. Collins, CPL, a Baton Rouge-based mineral consultant with an office in Clinton, represents a large group of landowners who have organized in an effort to lease their lands in the TMS at a fair price.  Collins confirmed the recent frenzy of activity.
 
Collins indicated that  “the leasing covers a wide expanse in excess of 75 miles across portions of the Louisiana parishes of East Baton Rouge, West Feliciana, East Feliciana, St. Helena, Tangipahoa, Washington and into the counties of Wilkinson, Amite, Pike and Wathall.  The leasing activity covers an area in excess of 3,600,000 acres."
 
Collins, who opened his Clinton office late last year, says that “the activity could be bigger than the Tuscaloosa Trend in terms of actual production, if the completion process is successfully worked out with various operators." He stressed that the prospective play straddles the state line of Louisiana  and Mississippi with an estimated “48  to 60 billion barrels of oil in place.
"This play is unique in that the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale is a formation hundreds of feet thick that underlies essentially the entire area.  Hydrocarbon-saturated portions appear to be 100 to 200 feet thick in some areas, but extend widely, so this is different from many of the past oil booms that targeted smaller oil and gas traps."  Collins stressed that all landowners in the prospect area are likely to have some thickness of saturated shale beneath their property.
A report prepared and published in 1996 by the Basin Research Institute and Louisiana State University confirms that BRI/LSU believed production could exceed over seven billion barrels. As Collins stated, “producing only ten to 20 percent could result in 4.8 to 12 billion barrels,” which obviously would be a lot of oil.
 
Collins lauded Encore and other operators who have advanced the new horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques, but points out that the process is still being perfected.
He points to other activity throughout the state and in particularly to what is going on in the northwest region of Louisiana in the parishes of Caddo, Bossier, Desoto, Red River, Sabine and others.  “Leasing has hit all- time highs, with lease prices exceeding $4,000 to $6,000 an acre for large landholdings, while small tracts are known to have been leased upwards of $10,000 an acre” where a new shale play identified as the Haynesville Shale has recently been discovered.
 
Collins, however,  is quick to point out that the formation in northwest Louisiana is primarily gas,  as opposed to the prospective oil zone in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale, where prices are not expected to reach those levels.
"The mineral  landowners in our association," Collins says, "all have a common interest and goal of a fair lease, favorable terms and a protective lease form."
 
Currently discussions are ongoing between Collins and numerous companies interested in being part of the development process by taking leases in what he believes to be a “win/win” trade for the landowners and the oil companies.
 
Collins warns that the initial leasing in the TMS began at $50 an acre for a three-to-five-year paid up lease, then elevated to $75 an acre, $100 an acre, in some cases reaching $150 an acre for paid up leases.
  "At today’s high prices for oil,” Collins says, "those lease terms are literally 30 years behind, even at the $150 an acre range."  Collins warns mineral landowners to be wary of the first offer they receive.
 
“Many landowners have told me they have hunting leases that exceed the amounts offered by some oil companies," Collins says.
 
Collins points to landowner groups throughout the country that have banded together for bargaining for “strength in numbers to achieve better negotiating power."
 
A review of the internet blog (startelegram.typepad.com/barnett_shale/) regarding the prolific Barnett Shale in the Dallas–Fort Worth, Texas–area identified several neighborhoods joining together and receiving $27,000 an acre and 26 percent royalty in one trade in Arlington, Texas.  “The process works when landowners lease together” Collins stated, as he points to a map identifying shale plays throughout the United States and Canada.
 
“While our group of landowners is not trying to replicate the incredible lease prices of gas shales in the TMS oil play, the lease terms offered to date are disproportionately low in light of record oil prices."  With oil estimated by some to reach $150 a barrel by July, leasing at the current rates of $10 to $50 an acre do appear quite low.
 
"If you're not careful, you could trade away three-fourths of an acre's oil for the price of a single barrel, and plenty of companies are out there right now offering that to landowners."
Collins indicated that numerous companies are popping up, attempting to take oil and gas leases at wholesale rates throughout the TMS area.  “Companies which aren’t even listed with the Secretary of State are attempting to purchase leases at rates that are so low that landowners should be wary when considering the signing of any oil and gas lease," Collins said.  Many landowners believe that because the lease term states three to five years, the lease will be up at that point.  Collins warns, however, that “the lease will actually exceed the term and extend to the life of the production if in paying quantities. That," Collins states, “could go on for many, many years under the terms of your lease contract." 
Encore reported potential drilling locations of 280 to 340 (640 acre spacing) and 560 to 640 (320 acre spacing).  In simple terms Collins indicated that would amount to “a well every 1 to 1.5 miles, if the formation yields the production as Encore has reported.
 
“It’s good to see the activity and to think of what prosperity it could bring to the area,” Collins states. He warns, however, those land/mineral owners who have not signed oil and gas leases to be cautious and informed about what they sign.
 
“We saw it once before, and we're hopeful we’ll see it again like the Tuscaloosa days,” Collins stated, indicating “most folks would love to have a well or two in their backyard”.
 
Persons may review further information about the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale  at tmslandowners.org 
 
end quote...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dakota Oil Fields of Saudi-Sized Reserves Make Farmers Drillers

quote:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601170&refer=home&sid=ayj1uo_gdNI4

Dakota Oil Fields of Saudi-Sized Reserves Make Farmers Drillers

By Anthony Effinger

June 3 (Bloomberg) -- John Bartelson, who smokes Marlboro Lights through fingers blackened with tractor grease, may look like an average wheat farmer. He isn't. He's one of North Dakota's new oil barons.

Every month, he gets a check for tens of thousands of dollars from a company in Houston called EOG Resources Inc., which drilled two oil wells on his land last year. He says the day his first royalty check arrived was one to remember.

``I smiled to beat hell, and I went to town and had a beer,'' Bartelson, 65, says.

His new wealth springs from the Bakken formation, a sprawling deposit of high-quality crude beneath the durum wheat fields of North Dakota, Montana and southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba. The Bakken may give the U.S. -- the world's biggest importer of oil -- a new domestic energy source at a time when demand from China and India is ratcheting up the global competition for supplies and propelling average U.S. gasoline prices to almost $4 a gallon.

And unlike the tar from Canada's oil sands, Bakken crude needs little refining. Swirl some of it in a Mason jar and it leaves a thin, honey-colored film along the sides. It's light - -almost like gasoline -- and sweet, meaning it's low in sulfur.

Best of all, the Bakken could be huge. The U.S. Geological Survey's Leigh Price, a Denver geochemist who died of a heart attack in 2000, estimated that the Bakken might hold a whopping 413 billion barrels. If so, it would dwarf Saudi Arabia's Ghawar, the world's biggest field, which has produced about 55 billion barrels.

Thin Deposit

The challenge is getting the oil out. Bakken crude is locked 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) underground in a layer of dolomite, a dense mineral that doesn't surrender oil the way more-porous limestone does. The dolomite band is narrow, too, averaging just 22 feet (7 meters) in North Dakota.

The USGS said in April that the Bakken holds as much as 4.3 billion barrels that can be recovered using today's engineering techniques. That's a fraction of the oil that Price said should be there, but it's still the largest accumulation of crude in the 48 contiguous U.S. states. North Dakota, where Bakken exploration is most intense now, won't become Saudi Arabia unless technology improves.

``The Bakken is the biggest thing in oil in the lower 48 right now,'' says Jim Jarrell, president of Ross Smith Energy Group Ltd., a research firm in Calgary. ``And among the least understood.''

Delaying the Peak

Some oil, like the 10.4 billion barrels estimated to be recoverable in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, remains off limits -- as a nature conservation measure -- even as President George W. Bush renews his calls for drilling there. North Dakota, already crisscrossed by farm roads, is open for business.

As traditional oil fields become scarce, exploration companies must tackle trickier ones to stay in business. Their success will determine when the world reaches peak oil -- the high point in production after which new supply will no longer be there to slake new demand. It's a gloomy concept. Peak oil theorists predict the mother of all oil shocks, complete with famine and wars for energy.

These days, big new oil deposits often come with caveats. Brazil's Petroleo Brasileiro SA says its offshore Tupi field contains as much as 8 billion barrels of oil, which the company hopes to start pumping next year. But the field is under more than four miles of water and rock, where pressure can crush drilling equipment.

Hedge Bus

The Bakken dolomite is hardly an obstacle, by comparison. And even if Price was too optimistic, the Bakken is big enough to make investors rich. Some have made fortunes already.

In April, a busload of hedge fund managers drove by Bartelson's land, ogling the metronomic pump jacks and the devilish orange flares of excess natural gas that are making parts of North Dakota look more like west Texas.

``There's nothing that can stop this play,'' says Mike Reger, chief executive officer of Northern Oil & Gas Inc., a five-person company near Minneapolis that has leased the mineral rights under 32,000 acres (13,000 hectares) in the North Dakota Bakken.

Reger, 32, brought the hedge fund managers up to see the oil field. Some, like Ryan Zorn of Houston-based investment management firm Saracen Energy Advisors LP, are investors in Northern already. Northern shares have risen 61 percent since being listed on the American Stock Exchange on March 26.

Fool's Gold

For decades, the Bakken was the fool's gold of the oil industry. The name describes a geological formation that looks like an Oreo cookie: two layers of black shale that bleed oil into the middle layer of dolomite. It's named after Henry O. Bakken, the North Dakota farmer who owned the land where the first drilling rig revealed the shale layers in the 1950s.

All of the layers are thin -- about 150 feet altogether -- and none of them give up oil easily. In older, vertical wells, oil would often flow for a month and then fizzle.

Now, companies like Austin, Texas-based Brigham Exploration Co.; Denver-based Whiting Petroleum Corp.; and EOG are drilling horizontally. They go straight down 10,000 feet and then put a slight angle in the mud motor, a 30-foot piece of tubing that drives the bit, so they hit the Bakken sideways, making a horizontal tunnel 4,500 feet long through the dolomite.

That exposes more of the oil-bearing rock. Then they pump pressurized water and sand into the hole to fracture the dolomite, making cracks for oil to seep through.

It eventually winds up in a pipeline that runs east to Clearbrook, Minnesota, and then south to Chicago.

Where Billionaires Roam

Several billionaires are at work in the Bakken. Harold Hamm's Enid, Oklahoma-based Continental Resources Inc. has leases on 487,000 acres in Montana and North Dakota. Hamm, who started out driving a truck, owns 73 percent of Continental, worth $7.9 billion. Philip Anschutz, 68, founder of Qwest Communications International Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group, is there, too.

So are two sons of billionaire H.L. Hunt, the 1930s wildcatter. Petro-Hunt LLC is owned by the trust estate of William Herbert Hunt, who was convicted in a civil trial with his brothers Lamar and Nelson Bunker of trying to corner the silver market in 1979. Hunt Oil Co., another Bakken operator, is owned by their half brother, Ray L. Hunt.

The big winner so far has been EOG, formerly a subsidiary of bankrupt energy trader Enron Corp. It drilled a horizontal well in western North Dakota just north of Parshall -- population 1,028 -- in April 2006. The well came online a month later and kicked out 1,883 barrels in the first seven days. Unlike the older vertical wells, it's still going. In March, it produced 2,305 barrels, according to the North Dakota Industrial Commission.

No Slam Dunk

EOG has eight rigs running on 320,000 acres of mineral leases in the North Dakota Bakken. The company said in its 2007 annual report that the area has the highest return of all the places in which it operates -- including Texas's Barnett Shale, the Gulf of Mexico coast and the Permian Basin of New Mexico.

The Bakken isn't foolproof. Far from it. Drilling there is expensive -- about $5 million a well, according to EOG -- and takes experience. Dallas-based Petro-Hunt's first well in the North Dakota Bakken didn't make money, company geologist Steve Bressler says. Brigham's Bergstrom Family Trust well came online at 277 barrels a day -- viable at today's high oil prices but not a gusher.

``There will be variances,'' says John Gerdes, an oil and gas analyst at SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Inc. in Houston. ``The rock matters. The people matter.''

Oil Rush

The success of EOG's Parshall well set off a land grab in North Dakota's Mountrail County. Land men -- the experts who move from boom to boom leasing mineral rights -- swarmed, paying ever higher prices for ground that for decades grew crops and concealed Cold War missile silos.

On private acreage, land men negotiate with mineral owners like Bartelson. They offer a bonus upfront to hold the mineral rights for three to five years, and they agree to pay a fraction of the revenue from any oil produced each month -- often from 1/8 to 3/16. On land with a producing well, the mineral lease lasts as long as the well does. On government land, the bonus is set at auction.

Bartelson in 2004 granted a five-year lease on 1,400 acres, under which he owns half the mineral rights. He got a bonus of $25 per mineral acre, or $17,500, plus one-sixth of any oil revenue. Times have changed since then. In November, Sinclair Oil Corp. of Salt Lake City paid $16,500 an acre at auction for half the mineral rights on 320 acres of government- owned land in the Parshall Field, according to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

`No Acreage'

``That's a record for Montana and North Dakota,'' BLM spokesman Greg Albright says.

Among the biggest companies punching holes in the North Dakota Bakken are Houston-based Marathon Oil Corp., the fourth- largest U.S. oil company, and Hess Corp. of New York, which is No. 5. No. 1 Exxon Mobil Corp. isn't active in the Bakken. John Freeman, an analyst at investment bank Raymond James & Associates Inc. in Houston, says Exxon is looking for bigger deposits overseas.

``Now, there's no acreage left,'' he says.

The truest believer in the Bakken might be Reger, the CEO of Northern Oil. He's certainly the loudest promoter.

Reger is a fourth-generation oilman. His great-grandfather managed operations for Mobil Oil, now part of Exxon Mobil, in the Williston Basin, the 110,000-square-mile (285,000-square- kilometer) geological formation in the northern plains that holds the Bakken and other deposits. Reger's grandfather leased land atop all of them. His father, uncle and brother are in the business, too.

``It's our basin,'' Reger says.

Bakken Hunters

If it works out the way Reger says, he and his partner, a former derivatives trader named Ryan Gilbertson, will be the Sergey Brin and Larry Page of the Bakken. Like the Google Inc. founders, Reger and Gilbertson are young -- Gilbertson is also 32 -- and they aren't afraid to roll the dice.

The lanky, blue-eyed Reger wears cowboy boots and a saucer-sized belt buckle emblazoned with an ``R.'' He vacationed this year in the Maldives in the Indian Ocean and insisted on a stopover to see Dubai's building boom. Gilbertson, meantime, shot a 10-foot-tall brown bear at eight paces in Alaska in 2007. He has a picture of him and the dead bear on the wall in his office.

`Son o' Bitches'

The future partners met while boating on Lake Minnetonka, outside Minneapolis. Gilbertson is from the area and traded derivatives for Piper Jaffray Cos. and a hedge fund firm named Telluride Asset Management LLC in nearby Wayzata, where Northern is based. Reger moved from Montana to St. Paul to attend the University of St. Thomas.

``We're both cowboy-boot-wearing, country-music-listening, gun-toting sons o' bitches,'' Gilbertson says. These days, they both drive black Cadillac Escalade SUVs and wear designer jeans.

Gilbertson says he knows more about interest-only mortgage bonds than he does about oil. But he says Northern will succeed because he and Reger weren't in business during the busts of earlier decades, so they aren't gun-shy today.

When EOG hit oil, they leased as many mineral rights in Mountrail County as they could, even as prices rose.

``The fear of these busts has clouded the judgment of so many players,'' Gilbertson says. ``We just grabbed everything with both hands.''

Turning Over Leases

Northern makes money without actually drilling or operating wells. Its strategy is like the game of Monopoly: lease in promising areas and get paid when someone else uses the land to drill.

The strategy is possible because of the way land is assembled for drilling. Reger's grandfather, uncle and father had made their money as lease brokers: They'd lease the land themselves or buy leases already granted and then sell them at higher prices to exploration companies.

Reger and Gilbertson intend to keep their leases, pay a share of the drilling costs and keep a portion of the oil revenue. Gilbertson says it was his idea. ``I saw the family's model as flawed,'' he says.

Leasing mineral rights means finding mineral owners. That's not always easy, because the farmer who owns the surface may not own the ``minerals,'' as they're known. Farmers can sell land and retain the minerals. When a mineral owner dies, the rights are often passed in equal portions to his or her children, Reger says, making them hard to track down.

Hauling County Records

To find mineral owners in Mountrail County, land men spend months in the courthouse, poring over photo-album-sized books that show who owns mineral rights and whether they've been leased.

One day in April, there were 50 people lugging books around. They line up well before the courthouse opens to get a spot on the first floor so they don't have to haul volumes up the stairs to an old law library that's been filled with folding tables to accommodate the horde.

Reger started leasing land for oil and gas exploration in Montana at age 15. He carried a portable typewriter to bang out contracts on landowners' kitchen tables.

It takes more than mineral rights to drill. Most western states are divided into neat little squares called sections. Each is one square mile, or 640 acres. If you want to drill an oil well in a section, you lease the mineral rights inside it. You don't need all of them, but you have to find all of the rights owners in that section and offer to let them participate.

This is where Northern makes its money.

Watching Permits

Reger's favorite time of day is 4 p.m., when the North Dakota Industrial Commission posts the names of companies that have gotten permits to drill. Very often, a rig is heading to a section in which Northern has mineral rights. He knows then that it will be a matter of time before he gets a letter from the company asking if he wants to share the cost -- and the revenue -- based on the percentage of mineral rights Northern controls in that section. He almost always says yes.

Reger makes it look easy because the Bakken is hot, says Summerfield ``Sam'' Baldridge, a partner at Montana Oil & Gas Properties Inc., founded by Reger's uncle, Steve, in Billings, Montana. Bigger companies are eager to drill, their wells are producing and oil prices are high.

``If it goes bad, you can go broke really quick,'' Baldridge says. ``You have to have guts and capital.''

Booms and Busts

Baldridge, 51, knows from experience. He was leasing mineral rights for Mobil in Montana in February 1986 when he heard on the radio that oil prices had plunged. In two days, a barrel of West Texas Intermediate crude fell to $15 from $20.

``We knew it was history,'' Baldridge says. ``From Calgary to Houston, everything went south.''

North Dakota has seen booms and busts from an array of oil deposits. The Bakken began forming 360 million years ago from dead algae that sank to the bottom of an ancient sea, where they were buried by successive layers of rock. Heat and pressure turned the algae into oil-saturated shale. Now it lies like a buried blanket under much of the Williston Basin.

Amerada Petroleum Corp. roughnecks started drilling what would become the first well in North Dakota on Sept. 3, 1950. They went through the Bakken before producing oil from deeper Silurian dolomite on April 4, 1951. A year later, Amerada (now Hess) finished the Henry O. Bakken well. Cuttings from the hole showed the shale layers that are now known by the same name.

Finding Porosity

Exploration in the Williston Basin grew for a few decades after that, ebbing and flowing with the price of oil. Mostly, drillers pursued deposits deeper than the Bakken. Those who tried to exploit it usually failed. The oil wouldn't keep flowing. ``Bakken was a four-letter word,'' says Dick Findley, a geologist in Billings.

In 1996, Findley, now 56, had a revelation. The consultant-turned-oilman went out to his rig in eastern Montana one night to check on things. At 2 a.m., it hit the Bakken dolomite and produced an unexpected rush of oil. Oil expands as it forms, and the pressure drives it into rock fractures. In the past, the dolomite hadn't seemed porous enough or fractured enough to release it.

``We got porosity that I didn't know existed,'' Findley says.

Findley and his partner, a land man named Bob Robinson, thought they could re-enter old wells and blast the middle dolomite layer with pressurized water to make cracks for crude to flow. They produced oil but not enough. So they turned to horizontal drilling. The technique had been around for decades.

500 Wells

Some had tried horizontal drilling in the Bakken in the early 1990s. They had aimed for the upper shale layer, though. Findley thought they could produce more by staying in the middle dolomite, even though the best, most porous rock was just 10 feet thick.

They drilled their first horizontal well in May 2000, blasted it with water, and the oil flowed. The field is called Elm Coulee, and today there are more than 500 wells there. Findley sold much of his interest to investors who could afford the drilling, though he still has an override -- a small percentage of any production.

Findley's success got others thinking about the Bakken. One was Michael Johnson, an independent geologist in Denver. Montana and North Dakota require companies to make public the information they collect when drilling, including gamma ray logs, which register the location of oil-bearing shale. Johnson examined logs from hundreds of wells east of Elm Coulee. He zeroed in on a dry one in Mountrail County that had similarities.

Word of Mouth

Johnson and two partners, land man Henry Gordon and geologist Robert Berry, leased about 38,000 acres in the area and shopped the mineral rights around. EOG bought 75 percent across all of the acres. In April 2006, EOG started drilling near a stream called Shell Creek. Workers drilled down some 9,000 feet and then started angling into the Bakken. They hit natural gas and crude.

Oil companies try to keep discoveries quiet so they can snap up more leases around them. Information travels fast in the Williston, though, where all of the roughnecks and rig operators know one another. Reger and Gilbertson had just formed Northern Oil when they got word from a lawyer in Montana that EOG had hit a big one. Reger sent his brother J.R. to lease as much land as he could, as close as he could, to EOG.

Pathfinder

In April, Reger took his busload of hedge fund managers to a well called Pathfinder being drilled by Slawson Exploration Co. out of Wichita, Kansas. Northern owns only 3 percent of Pathfinder but has land all around it. Success here would almost certainly mean more drilling in adjacent sections.

``From this location, we are literally masters of all we survey,'' Reger says.

The drill had hit the Bakken layer two weeks earlier, on Easter Sunday, producing a burst of natural gas. Where there's gas, there's often oil. As the rig clanks and groans like a motorized Godzilla, the hedge fund managers gather inside the trailer and crowd around the desk of Jon Starkweather, a ``mud logger'' who analyzes the rock chips coming up the hole. His window is covered with long charts that look like electrocardiograms.

``We landed this one just right,'' the bearded Starkweather says. Recent gas ventings, called kicks, confirm it.

Even if Reger and Gilbertson stopped gathering more mineral leases, they would make a fortune on what they have already, Reger says.

``I could take a nap for two years under my desk and wake up a hero,'' he says.

Millionaires

Reger's 14 percent stake in Northern is worth about $49 million. Gilbertson has shares worth $24 million. Whiting Petroleum's shares have more than doubled in the past 12 months, triple the 34 percent gain for a group of 96 energy companies in the Russell 2000 Index.

The other people doing well in the Bakken are the mineral owners under the oil wells -- folks like John Bartelson. Whiting paid them $56 million in 2007. EOG declines to say what it paid, though it's certainly more because it operates more wells. Whiting gets much of its Bakken revenue from shares of EOG wells it owns. It acquired them by buying Robert Berry's remaining stake in the Parshall acreage after EOG struck oil.

Bartelson's checks are about to get bigger. One more EOG well just came online, he says, and another is about to be fractured with water. Still another has been permitted for drilling. For now, he's farming. The oil market is fickle, he says. Previous crashes drove the rigs out of North Dakota for years, leaving only the wheat.

``It'll crash again,'' Bartelson says, sipping on a late- afternoon cup of coffee beside his tractor.

Maybe so. But with crude trading above $125 a barrel, it'll be a long time before the rigs leave again, and John Bartelson is likely to be a wealthy man before they do.

To contact the reporter on this story: Anthony Effinger in Portland, Oregon, at aeffinger@bloomberg.net

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FACT: US OIL SHALE, trillions of barrels there for the taking.

Quote:
 

Fact Sheet: U.S. Oil Shale Resources 

What is Oil Shale?

U.S. western oil shale is carbonate rock,

generally marlstone that is very rich in organic

sedimentary material called “kerogen.” Eastern

shales are more often silica based.

Oil shales are “younger” in geologic age than

crude oil-bearing formations; natural forces of

pressure and temperature have not yet converted

the sediments to crude oil.

 

Where is Oil Shale Found?

The richest, most concentrated deposits are found

in the Green River Formation in western

Colorado, southeastern Utah, and southern

Wyoming.

Other significant, less concentrated deposits exist

in the Devonian, Antrim, and Chattanooga shale

formations in several eastern and southern states

and parts of Alaska.

 

How Much Oil Shale Does America Have?

America’s total oil shale resources could exceed

6 trillion barrels of oil equivalent. However, most

of the shale is in deposits of insufficient thickness

or richness to access and produce economically.

 

How Much Oil Shale Could Be Recovered?

Potentially recoverable resources are generally

deemed to be at least 15 feet thick and have

potential yields of 15 gallons per ton or more.

Oil shale yields more than 25 U.S. gal/ton are

generally viewed as the most economically

attractive, and hence, the most favorable for

initial development.

About 1.8 trillion barrels of shale oil are thought

to reside in deposits greater than 15 gallons per

ton in the Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

 

Who Owns the Oil Shale Resources?

The U.S. Government owns and manages about

73 percent of the lands that contain significant oil

shale deposits in the west. Federal lands contain

about 80 percent of the known recoverable

resource in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

State governments and localities and Native

American Tribes also own oil shale lands.

 

References

1 Reproduced from Oil & Gas Journal “Is Oil Shale America’s Answer to Peak-Oil Challenge?” Pennwell Corporation, August

9, 2004

2Duncan, D.C. and V.E. Swanson: “Organic-Rich Shales of the United States and World Land Areas, U.S.G.S. Circular 523,

1965; as reported in U.S. Office of Technology Assessment, “An Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies” 1980.

3 Reproduced from Oil and Gas Journal, August 9, 2004

4 U.S. Office of Technology Assessment “An Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies, 1980, p. 92, Table 14)

5 Reproduced from Oil and Gas Journal, August 9, 2004

6 U.S. Office of Technology Assessment “An Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies,
 
end quote...

Sam T. Mullins
Petroleum Exploration Geologist
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hail the Shale"... There's oil in them there hills...

 

QUOTE:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzYzYWJmMDc2ZmIzZWQ4N2NkOTEzMzQ0MmM5ZTYwZDc=

July 2, 2008 4:00 AM

Hail the Shale, More drilling options.

By Mary Fallin

The debate over exploiting America’s domestic oil and gas reserves has focused primarily on the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, and on offshore regions currently off-limits to exploration. While we should drill in those areas to reduce our reliance on oil imports, a third resource, the vast oil-shale deposits in the Rocky Mountain West, could be even more crucial in our quest for energy independence.

The Green River formation underlying parts of Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado could hold as many as two trillion barrels of oil, trapped in rocks relatively close to the surface. Production from those deposits could reach ten million barrels of oil per day — virtually tripling our current domestic production — according to a report by the Department of Energy.


It takes a geologist to fully understand the potential of oil shale. In simple terms, oil shale is sedimentary rock saturated with a petrochemical substance called kerogen. It’s oil that didn’t quite make it to liquid status.

Kerogen is extracted by heating the oil shale to between 650 and 700 degrees. The process is similar to that being used in Canada to extract oil from tar sands. Canada has estimated its potential reserves from tar sand at 174 billion barrels of oil, but America’s oil shale reserves could far surpass the most optimistic Canadian estimates.

Initial methods for extracting kerogen from oil shale involved mining the rock, like an ore, and heating it through industrial processes. However, work is underway by at least one oil company to drill into the oil-shale deposits, insert heating elements, and wait for the kerogen to bubble to the surface, much like the traditional means of drilling for oil.

This would lessen surface disturbances and environmental damage, a vital concern when we talk about opening millions of acres of Rocky Mountain wilderness to exploration.

New developments in the Rocky Mountains are just part of a promising energy story. The Barnett Shale formation in north Texas was off limits to production for decades, until new technologies like hydraulic fracturing made these natural-gas reserves economically feasible to pump out of the ground. Today the Barnett Shale is one of the most prolific fields in the nation.

Perhaps the best news is that America is home to the largest oil-shale deposits on earth. According to a report by the Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory, “even a moderate estimate of 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil shale in the Green River Formation is three times greater than the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.”

Imagine a scenario where most of America’s oil needs flowed from ANWR, offshore, traditional onshore wells, and the oil shales of the Rocky Mountain region. “Present U. S. demand for petroleum products is about 20 million barrels per day,” the Argonne report said. “If oil shale could be used to meet a quarter of that demand, the estimated 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from the Green River Formation would last for more than 400 years.”

Extracting these huge oil reserves will require capital and attention to environmental issues. But it’s hardly a Manhattan Project.

Most significantly, more than 70 percent of the Green River Formation lies beneath federal lands. As a nation, we already own one of the largest potential oil reserves on the planet. If we fail to use it, the alternative is clear — increasing dependence on OPEC oil, ever-higher prices and a return to the energy crisis of the 1970s.

— Republican congresswoman Mary Fallin is a former three-term lieutenant governor of Oklahoma who was elected to represent that state’s Fifth District in Congress in 2006.       end of quote...


Sam T. Mullins,
25 year long Petroleum Exploration Geologist,
Patriot, and proud father of a 2 time veteran of the Iraqi theater of operation in the Global War on Terror...

Sam T. Mullins,
Petroleum Exploration Geologist

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »